An apology to our readers due to the recent Ron Paul article

ronpaulapology

The following message regarding my article was forwarded to the IPR Facebook group.

On August 8th, 2016, I published an article on American Third Party Report and Independent Political Report titled Ron Paul says “we don’t need a third party,” refuses to endorse any candidate for president this year. Unfortunately, while the very short article was not factually inaccurate, I was completely wrong in choosing its headline.

As it was pointed out by an individual named Austin Mulka in a message that was forwarded to the IPR Facebook group, Ron Paul DID NOT say that there was no need for a third party to exist in America; his full quote (which my post included), was:

“We don’t need a third party, we need at least a second party that will challenge [the] system.” 

Dr. Paul was essentially saying that there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between the two major duopoly parties, and that there is a need for an actual “second party” alternative to the unified Democratic/Republican Party (i.e. a third party).

My headline made no mention of this; and Austin Mulka is right; the quote I used in the headline of the article (which has just now been updated and fixed) was taken completely out of context and made it seem as though Dr. Paul is actively opposed to third parties. In actuality, Dr. Paul has a long history of being friendly to third parties, starting with his 1988 presidential campaign as the Libertarian Party nominee, up to his endorsement of Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin in 2008 and he has not said anything unfavorable about third parties in the present day, either.

My headline was sensationalist and was conceived with more of a clickbait-ish desire for views rather than to be devoted to complete and total accuracy. Because of this immaturity and lack of good judgement,  several people who saw the headline said they were disappointed in Dr. Paul and would not be supporting him anymore, according to Austin Mulka. This turn of events shows the gravity words can have and the responsibility I have for making sure all of my posts are in accordance with the truth. As the author of the article, I take full responsibility for it. I would like to apologize to all the readers who viewed the article and formed the wrong impression of Dr. Paul’s attitude towards third parties. I would also like to apologize to Dr. Paul himself, a man for whom I have great respect for and who helped me first become truly interested in politics in 2007, during his second presidential campaign.

Once again, I apologize for using such a sensationalist, inaccurate headline and for causing confusion among those who saw the headline. I can assure everyone that something like this will not happen again. Thank you to Austin Mulka for calling me out on my moronic, clickbait hungry, pseudo-journalistic decision regarding the article’s headline, and I hope that every Ron Paul supporter who saw the article’s headline will see this apology and know that Ron Paul was, and will always be, a friend to third parties in the United States.

Krzysztof Lesiak

Founder, American Third Party Report

August 10th, 2016

2 responses to “An apology to our readers due to the recent Ron Paul article

  1. Mr. Lesiak, my respect for you has just more than doubled. It had already been growing as I have been reading more of your objective and informative articles over the past several months.
    True and honest libertarians are willing to admit errors and accept responsibilities. You probably did not need to be quite as harsh on yourself because the context that made the quote fully understandable to you might have been missing. I have heard Ron use that apt witticism a number of times over the past 30 or 40 years. Whether in public or private meetings it has always been in the context that the “Republicrat” Party is essentially one party rather than two. So we really need a “second party” to break the stranglehold. Ron Paul has never been afraid to point out the “not a dime’s worth of difference” aspect of the Republican and Democratic parties, even at the risk of some smearmonger (think SPLC) trying to use it as a negative against him because George Wallace popularized it in 1968.
    Again, thumbs up to you and also to Austin Mulka.

    Like

  2. Thank you.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s